Submissions


Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

Author Guidelines

The articles accepted by Enunciación correspond to the types of articles endorsed by Publindex. They must show conceptual consistency, as well as depth in the treatment of the problem, and they must be written in a clear and structured style according to the nature of the text. Articles submitted must be original and associated with ongoing or completed research.

1. Types of articles derived from research
2. Thematic lines
3. Formal aspects for the presentation of articles
4. Article evaluation process
5. Copyright notice
6. Privacy statement

  1. Types of articles
  • Research articles: A document that details the original results of research projects. The processes from which they are derived are explicitly indicated in the document, as well as the name of their authors and their institutional affiliation. The structure is shown in the next section.
  • Reflections on praxis: A document that corresponds to the results of studies carried out by the author(s) on a theoretical or practical problem. They present research results from an analytical, interpretive, or critical perspective of the author on a specific topic while using original sources.
  • Theoretical discussion papers: Studies carried out by the author(s) in order to give an overview of the state of a specific domain of science and technology, indicating the prospects for its development and future evolution. These articles are elaborated by those who have managed to have an overall view of the domain and are characterized by an extensive bibliographic review of at least 50 references.
  • Short articles: A brief document that preliminarily or partially presents original results of a scientific research study and generally requires prompt dissemination.
  • Case reports: A document that presents the results of a study on a particular situation in order to disseminate the methodological and technical experiences used in a specific case. Case reports include a systematic and commented literature review of similar cases.

The following types of documents are part of the journal. They will be invited and evaluated by the editorial board of the journal.

  • Guest author contribution: Unpublished documents or already published by authors of recognized trajectory and production.
  • Translation: A document of thematic interest to the journal which is available in another language.
  • Review: Documents reviewing books or events.

 

  1. Topics

Enunciación receives articles on the following subjects:

  • Literature and other languages
  • Language, society, and school
  • Language pedagogies
  • Language and conflict
  • Language, media, and technology

 

  1. Formal aspects for the submission of articles
  • The submission of contributions must be made through the online platform, in which the anonymous manuscript (a .doc or .docx file) should be uploaded, the author information should be filled in, and the Format for authorization and guarantee of first publication one author or Format for authorization and guarantee of first publication two or more authors should be uploaded as a "complementary file" (please use the corresponding format).
  • Sending the document in Word format is recommended. However, for authors using free text editors, free office formats and Open Office are accepted.
  • Articles must have a maximum of 8000 words and a minimum of 4000 (for research articles, reflections, and review; 3000-3500 words for short articles; and a maximum of 2000 words for reviews). They must be in letter format, in Times New Roman (12 point) with 1.5 spacing (excluding figures and tables) and 3 cm margins. Please mind the type of article (review, reflection, research, short, case, or review) and the thematic line to which it applies (# 2).
  • The title must be short and clear, and it must reflect the macrostructure of the article. It must have a maximum of 12 words. Authors must provide the title both in Spanish and in English.
  • Please submit the article without any information from the author to ensure blind evaluation. This information must be duly filled in the OJS [institutional affiliation of the author, last academic title, link to research groups, and e-mail, preferably institutional].
  • The abstract should be no longer than 250 words in both Spanish and English, and it must indicate the research problem, the methodology used, and the results obtained. 
  • The keywords should be between three and seven in Spanish and English; Enunciación recommends, in order to make the selection, the UNESCO (http://vocabularies.unesco.org/browser/thesaurus/es/) and ITESO (http://quijote.biblio.iteso.mx/catia/tesauro/thes.aspx?term=Literatura) Thesauri.
  • Please review the structure of articles according to the type of document to be submitted (see below).
  • Figures and Tables must be presented according to the Image Guide as well as in a separate file.
  • The structure of the document should follow APA 7th edition standards; for more details, please refer to the Reference Use Guide.
  • Footnotes should be at the bottom of the page, recording their numbering in the body of the articles and should only be used if relevant.
  • Bibliographic references should only include those cited in the text, tables, figures, or notes. no other references should appear in the list, even if they have been consulted by the authors during the elaboration of the work. We suggest using tools such as Microsoft Word citations and bibliography (for APA 7th edition), Zotero, and Mendeley, among others. The bibliographic list should be elaborated in alphabetical order (for more information, please consult the Reference Use Guide).
  • It is necessary to include the DOI codes of articles published in scientific journals.
  1. Peer review

All the articles will be subjected to a first analysis of originality via the Turnitin software. The result of this analysis will be reviewed by the journal's Editorial Committee, which will decide if the article is approved to start the peer review process. 

It is important to note that the manuscripts will not begin the peer review process or will be returned to their authors for modification if:

  • The topic does not correspond to the thematic field of the journal.
  • It does not follow the guidelines for authors.
  • The author(s) have already published in the issue of the volume to which they are submitting the paper.
  • The Format for authorization and guarantee of first publication is not sent to the journal.
  • The article is not derived from a research process.

If the document meets the criteria above and is approved by the Editorial Committee, it will be sent for academic peer review through the double-blind procedure, in which the confidentiality of both the author(s) and the reviewers will be preserved. The criteria to be evaluated are: 

  • Form and content
  • Relevance of the topic
  • Adequate research problem with the selected thematic subject
  • Solidity and sufficiency in the theoretical references
  • Clarity and pertinence in the selection of the employed methodology
  • Internal consistency between the theoretical perspective, objectives, methodology, interpretations, results, and conclusions.

From the acceptance of the invitation, the peer review has twenty (20) calendar days to issue their concept. The academic peer may suggest publishing without any modification or publishing after modifications, requesting to reevaluate the article after modifications or rejecting it. In case of differences in opinions, the Editorial Committee will designate a third evaluator to solve the conflict.

You can consult the evaluation form used by the Enunciation reviewers here: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/enunc/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/353

The editorial assistant will be in charge of informing the author(s) of the opinion and the suggestions of the evaluators. The authors will have to adjust the manuscript within a time established by the editorial team. Finally, once the reviewers verify the changes, they will issue a final decision on the article, which will be communicated to the Editorial Committee and the authors of the text. 


Sections

  1. Research Article

    A document that details the original results of research projects. The processes from which they are derived are explicitly indicated in the document, as well as the name of their authors and their institutional affiliation. The structure generally used consists of introduction, methodology, results, conclusions, acknowledgements and bibliographical references.

    The structure of a research article is as follows:
    1. Introduction
    2. Theoretical or conceptual framework
    3. Methodology
    4. Results and analysis
    5. Conclusions
    6. Acknowledgments: Information about the research project from which this article is derived, and the institutional filiation. Indicate the funding institution, if the research is financed. This information should not overpass one hundred (100) words.

    7. Bibliographic references.

    Note: The extension of the research article is among six thousand (6000) and eight thousand (8000) words, including bibliographic references.

  2. Reflections on Praxis

    A document that correspond to the results of studies carried out by the author(s) on a theoretical or practical problem. They present research results from an analytical, interpretative or critical perspective of the author on a specific topic, using original sources.

    The structure of a reflection article is as follows:
    1. Introduction.
    2. Theses and arguments.
    3. Methodological perspective for the proposed reflection.
    4. Conclusions.
    5. Acknowledgments: Information about the research project from which the article is derived, and the institutional filiation. Indicate the funding institution and, the research is financed. This information should not overpass one hundred (100) words.
    6. Bibliographic references.

    Note: The extension of the reflection article is among six thousand (6000) and eight thousand (8000) words, including bibliographic references.

     

  3. Theoretical Discussion Papers

    Studies carried out by the author(s) in order to give an overview of the state of a specific domain of science and technology, indicating the prospects for its development and future evolution. These articles are carried out by those who have managed to have an overall view of the domain and are characterized by an extensive bibliographic review of at least 50 references.

    The structure of a review article is as follows:
    1. Introduction: The problem is exposed, as well as objectives and central theoretical categories of analysis.
    2. Methodology: Materials and methods used in the review process.
    3. Analysis and discussion (interpretation process).
    4. Conclusions: The concepts treated in the introduction and the results are linked together and analyzed.
    5. Acknowledgments: Information about the research project from which the article is derived, and the institutional filiation. Indicate the funding institution, if the research is financed. This information should not overpass one hundred (100) words.
    6. Bibliographic references. Review articles require minimum of fifty (50) references, both in the text body as well as in the references list.

    Note: The extension of the review article is among six thousand (6000) and eight thousand (8000) words, including bibliographic references.

  4. Short Article

    A brief document that preliminarily or partially presents original results of a scientific research study and generally requires prompt dissemination.

    The general structure of a brief is as follows:
    1. Introduction.
    2. Theoretical or conceptual framework.
    3. Methodology.
    4. Results and analysis.
    5. Conclusions.
    6. Acknowledgments: Information about the research project from which the article is derived, and the institutional filiation. Indicate the funding institution, if the research is financed. This information should not overpass one hundred (100) words.
    7. Bibliographic references.

    Note: The extension of a brief is among three thousand (3000) and four thousand (4000) words, including bibliographic references.

     

  5. Report on educational cases in language fields

    A document that presents the results of a study on a particular situation in order to disseminate the methodological and technical experiences used in a specific case. The report includes a systematic and commented literature review of similar cases.

    The structure is as follows:
    1. Introduction.
    2. Experience foundation.
    3. Experience description.
    4. Experience systematization and analysis.
    5. Conclusions.
    6. Acknowledgments: Information about the research project from which the article is derived, and the institutional filiation. Indicate the funding institution, if the research is financed. This information should not overpass one hundred (100) words.
    7. Bibliographic references.

    Note: The extension of a brief report is among three thousand (3000) and four thousand (4000) words, including bibliographic references.



Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses given to Enunciación will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be available for any other purpose or another person.

Loading...